PREACHERS AND POLITICS

The Covid lock down has had some positive side effects. One is that many churches, whether they are meeting in person or not, are also online with either web streaming or posting their sermons on YouTube or both.  Over the last few weeks and months I have watched parts of many online services from a variety of different denominations.

One thing that bothers and outright annoys me however, is to see how many preachers have turned their pulpits into political soapboxes. Whether the issue be COVID conspiracy theories, the US presidential election, or God forbid, the scandal mess that is Canadian politics.  Frankly, I am surprised that the congregants of such preachers tolerate this.  I always assumed that people do not go to church to hear a political speech, but rather to worship God and be instructed in the Word of God.  While it is mainly the mega church pastors with national and international profiles that are guilty of politicizing the pulpit, other churches are jumping on the bandwagon as well.  More surprising is that it is primarily protestant churches – churches who profess to believe in the separation of church and state – who are guilty of this.

Let me clear up one thing right from the start of my rant, and that is that I am greatly interested in politics.  Politics is my favourite spectator sport, and I follow political events the way others follow the Stanley Cup (when it can be followed). I have political convictions and opinions.  And during my brief retirement, I even voiced some of them.  But now that I am again practising ministry, I keep these views  mainly to myself, and I bite my tongue when I am in the pulpit, or on social media, or this public blog.

The reasons for that go beyond the separation of church and state, though I believe in that firmly.  As a preacher of the gospel of Jesus Christ, I am called, along with the entire Christian church, to proclaim that gospel to all people and all nations.  No matter what a person’s political conviction, the good news of salvation in Christ is directed to them, and there is a place for them in the church.

The New Testament teaches, that the church is about the Kingdom of God. Jesus said that this kingdom is “not of this world”. (John 18:36) He also said, “The Kingdom of God is within you (or among you). (Luke 17:21) Actually, Jesus had a great deal to say about where the Kingdom of God comes from, how to get into it, who will be included, who will be excluded etc.  Christians, when they pray the Lord’s Prayer, pray that “thy Kingdom come”.  It is a mystery.  It is already here, and it will one day come in a vert visible way.  Right now it exists everywhere that Jesus truly is King, whether in an individual human life, or in gathered churches over which Jesus’ Kingdom of love and truth and justice truly reigns. The calling of all messengers of the Gospel, namely us preachers, is to work for the advancement of that kingdom.

The world of government and politics is its own world that is necessary for the preservation of order and peace in society.  The New Testament clearly teaches that we are to pray for, and be subject to, the government of the day. In Romans 13:1 Paul makes the astounding statement that “there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God.” It is important to note that neither Paul, nor Jesus for that matter, lived under a democratic government.  The Roman government in Jesus and Paul’s day was a ruthless autocratic and often cruel government.   But neither Jesus nor Paul could be called political activists, and certainly they were not revolutionaries.  Jesus urged His followers to “give to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what belongs to God.”  (Matthew 22:21)

People often mistakenly assume that democracy is their God-given right.  While I am thankful to live in a democracy,  we must remember that Christianity flourished under the pagan autocratic regime, and under the regimes that followed it. It also flourishes today in countries that are not ruled by democratic governments.

Living as we do in a democracy, we do have the right to express political opinions even if they are contrary to the government of the day. We have a right to call out politicians who are corrupt, immoral, hypocritical or dictatorial.  We have the right to advance our own ideas for solutions.  But we do NOT have the right to mix this activity, and confuse it with our religion.  When a nationally known preacher says on television, that “a true Christian cannot possibly vote for ….”, then in my opinion he has clearly stepped outside of his proper role of preaching the gospel (the good news of salvation through Christ).  And that is a two way street. Politicians need to keep their nose out of the church and not prey on people of any religion to gain their support.

I was in Kenya in 2017, when the Supreme Court of that nation declared the results of the presidential election null and void, and ordered that a new election be held.  I followed that election with great interest, and I have to say it was the nastiest campaign I have ever seen, and it included violence that led to many deaths.  It also included politicians who visited churches on Sunday morning and were allowed to speak.  After the service they would curse and tell lies about their opponent on the steps of the church.   I witnessed politicians speaking at a funeral that I attended, and apparently they also visited weddings.  Both weddings and funerals are usually largely attended events in Kenya and so considered fair game as places to go and seek votes. To his credit, the Principal at the college where I was teaching, got up in chapel one day and declared that he wanted teachers and students alike to leave their political opinions outside the gate of the college campus.  And they did.

So what would I do if a politician came to my church?  S/he would be welcomed and greeted as any other visitor (we usually do not announce names of visitors). They would be welcome to worship as anybody else.  They would not however be allowed on the platform, nor would my message be tailored for or against them.

Let me end with an apparently true story.  In a church in the British countryside the king of England unexpectedly walked into the church while the preacher was in the midst of his sermon.  Immediately he changed what he was preaching on and launched into a eulogy of the king and the royal family.  Later in the week a package was delivered to the preacher.  Inside was a crucifix with this note: This crucifix is to be hung on the pillar opposite the pulpit, so that its occupant might be reminded of his proper subject. 

RACISM

They say it is better to turn on the light rather than to curse the darkness. But amidst the current unrest and rhetoric about racism, it seems we have trouble finding the switch to turn on the lights.  I have debated whether I should say anything at all, as whatever I post will without doubt disappear amidst the current noise. Racism, pure and simple, stems from the belief or assumption that one’s own race is superior to another.  In the previous century, we have seen where that can lead as a racist government in Germany sought to extinguish another race. And in North America, the violent 1960’s and 70’s seem to be re-appearing before our very eyes.  And for those of us old enough to remember, the racial violence of the 60’s and 70’s disappeared but racism did not.  It is like a wound of humanity that recedes but flares up again and again.  So in Germany today we have “neo-nazis”, in other regions we have “ethnic cleansing”, and in North America,  “white supremacists” have never really disappeared, and even appear under the guise of religion, which is something that I find particularly evil.

To really understand racism, it helps to experience what it feels like to be on the receiving end of racial discrimination.  My three visits to Africa in the last 5 years have been interesting in that regard. For the first time in my life I was part of a “visible minority”. As a white person, I stuck out anywhere I went.  For the most part, it was no big deal.  But a few experiences stick out as either humorous or to put it mildly, interesting.  In Cameroon, I was walking down a village street alongside a missionary, who was also white. We passed a large group of young children, who upon seeing us, began to shout, “White man! White man! White man with a long nose!”  I was dumbfounded and so I said nothing.  My colleague, who wasn’t experiencing this for the first time, said to the children that they should go home and have their parents teach them some manners!

Another time, in the town of Eldoret in Kenya, I was out shopping with a fellow pastor and friend who was black, and whom I got to know in Canada.  At one point we needed to pick up his wife, who was inside a mall.  Since it was hard to find parking, my friend pulled up beside the curb and sent me inside to fetch his wife, since she did not know where he would be parked. I did so, and as we walked the considerable distance to the car, I was conscious of many stares being fixed upon us.  When we were inside the car, my friend explained to me what they were thinking – a young woman with an older man of a different colour – why that could only mean trouble.  We laughed.  Sort of.

On the campus of the college where I was teaching for three months in 2017 and 2018, I was the only white person.  Since it was a Christian college, at no time did I feel looked down or discriminated against in any way.  Teachers, whatever their skin colour are held in high regard in Africa and are treated with deference and respect.  If anything, my skin colour resulted in other assumptions being made – that I was rich, and people were very eager to be my “friends”.  But when I worshipped with these students and the other staff, I felt as one of them – except for the times that they forget that I was there and would lapse into the Swahili or some other tribal language.

Ah, and then there was apartheid in South Africa – the political and social system during the era of White minority rule, under which the people of South Africa were divided by their race and the different races were forced to live separately from each other.  Nelson Mandela was instrumental in leading to the end of that system and that did not occur without struggle.  I’ve never been to South Africa, but I have heard that while apartheid is gone as a system, old prejudices still survive.

Indeed, old prejudices are hard to eradicate.  What helps?  My advice is to interact with and get to know someone of a different race as a person.  Learn to see this person not as a member of a different race, but simply as a fellow-human being.  If you do this in a true spirit of humility and openness, you will find that God created only one type of human being.  The skin colour may be different, but essentially, we are all the same, created in the image of God and therefore entitled to dignity, respect, and worthy to be treated with kindness.

 

IS CHURCH AN ESSENTIAL SERVICE?

ESSENTIAL WORKERS

Not too long ago I went into the church building where I currently serve as pastor in order to retrieve something from my office.  As I entered the foyer, I was saddened to see the monthly calendar of events for March 2020 on a table.  Not too far from it was the Sunday bulletin for March 17 – the last public worship service held at the church.

For the last 7 weeks I have been conducting worship, and preaching sermons from my home, seated in front of either a telephone or now a computer. I am able to speak to everyone who wants to participate at the same time, and I could hear, and now even see them.  Of course, it is not the same as having them sitting in front of me, but it is better than no contact at all.  During these online services, we pray, read Scripture, make announcements, greet one another, and preach and listen to sermons.  Many churches all over the world are doing the same thing. My heart almost skipped a beat when I saw one of my former students in Kenya preaching on FACEBOOK LIVE.

Here in Ontario Canada, much of life the way we know it has ground to a halt. Borders are closed to international travel.  Restaurants, stores, and businesses are closed.  Except for those who are considered “essential services” – grocery stores, gas stations, pharmacies, and believe it or not, liquor stores are considered an essential service.  But not churches or other places of worship.

Amazingly, churches, synagogues, and mosques have cooperated almost across the board with the government order that forbids the gathering of groups larger than 5, or larger than 10 for funerals, this despite the fact that Christianity, Judaism, and Islam all had holy days in the month of April.  Why? For a variety of reasons.  Christians believe that God has ordained civil governments for the preservation of order, and that obedience of such authorities is mandated in Holy Scripture. (Romans 13:1-6). Also, the more we learn about COVID-19, the more most people are convinced that it is the safe and right thing to do.  In fact it may also be the loving thing to do – to be protective not only of ourselves, but of others too.  Since it is possible to have the corona virus and not even know it or have symptoms, and yet still able to spread the virus, I am quite willing to do what it takes, including staying home from church, to prevent infecting someone else. (I’m not particularly eager to catch it myself).

But as in most things religious, not everyone agrees.  Churches have conducted “drive in services” – at first illegally, and lately with permission from the Premier – and the media of course was right there to tell us all about it.

Some of the dissenters have suggested that they must defy the government orders because they answer to a higher power, and others have suggested that church is an “essential service”.

But is it really?  You can look at that in two ways, and from two different perspectives.  Some would argue that corporate worship – in person – is essential to carrying out the Christian faith.  In other words, if we can’t gather in groups in person, we are not able to worship God, and unable to experience the teaching, and the encouragement from other believers that is essential to our faith.

Perhaps a look into the history of Christianity is helpful here.  The church has not always met publicly, nor in large groups.  One example of this is the persecution that arose in the very early days of Christianity.  In those early days Christians had no church buildings as we know them. The churches met in private homes, or in public places for larger gatherings.  But when that became too dangerous because of the arrest and persecution of Christians, the church literally went underground.  They met in subterranean burial places called “catacombs”. Many of these still exist today, and visitors can see the religious graffiti and inscriptions there.  Persecution under various regimes throughout the ages has often caused the church to meet in secret.  While one could argue, “at least they were able to meet”, these meetings can hardly be compared to what we would call church services today.  They met in the only way possible for them, since the technology that we now have did not exist. It is interesting to note that all over the world today, Christian churches are “making do” despite their buildings being closed. The survival of the church does not depend on whether the buildings are open or closed.  Is this situation ideal?  Of course not.  Would we like to be back where we were?  Certainly.  But those are not sufficient reasons for civil disobedience in my mind.  Neither do the current emergency measures violate any “charter rights” in my opinion.

Is church essential?  Another way of looking at this involves not the needs of the church, but the needs of society.  Jesus said that His followers are “the light of the world” and the “salt of the earth” (Matthew 5:12-13).  In other words, the church is essential for the well-being of society, and its message of hope and salvation is indispensable. Anyone who has a knowledge of history will know that our world, with some of its educational and health-care institutions would be a very different place were it not for the church.  Or to put it another way, it is essential that the church engages with society again, and that is why we do hope and pray for the day when our churches will re-open.

What is not widely reported in the media is the fact that some 401 pastors and churches in Ontario have written to the Premier of Ontario,  respectfully asking for permission to gradually re-open churches in early June. The letter contains a very safe and responsible plan that will involve some careful protocols and guidelines that we will need to observe.   The Premier has not yet responded to the letter, but I expect there will be some sort of announcement soon.  Until then, we will keep on being the church the best way that we can.  Church is not cancelled.

EASTER IS NOT CANCELLED!

Easter is not cancelled.  Come to think of it, that has been tried before, in fact right from the start. After Jesus had been buried, the religious leaders of the day persuaded Pilate to post guards outside of Jesus’ tomb because “Otherwise, his disciples may come and steal the body and tell people that he has been raised from the dead”. (Matthew 27:64 NIV) But of course despite the efforts to “make the tomb as secure as you know how” the tomb was guarded in vain.  No power in the universe could keep Jesus in the tomb.  He came out of it, just as He had said.

In the first century of Christianity others tried suppressing the message of the Risen Christ.  Roman emperors like Nero and Diocletian and others ruthlessly persecuted and put to death many of the early Christians.  But they could neither stop the message of the Resurrection, nor the spread of that message and the growth of the movement that became Christianity. And in the twentieth century,  the 60 years of communism also failed to cancel Easter.

In the former Soviet Union, atheism was the official state religion.  I remember as a child learning about the “underground church” in the various Russian states.  Mao Tse Tung in China also persecuted Christians with a vengeance.

In 2020 Easter is very different, but it is not cancelled.  There is no Easter Parade on New York’s Fifth Avenue. Families will not (should not) be gathering for big Easter dinners. There are no new clothes for people to show off at Easter services.  In fact church buildings  all over the world are closed.  But that cannot cancel Easter.  Christians all over the globe are celebrating the Resurrection of Christ, and worshipping the Risen Christ.  The church, that I currently serve is closed like all others.  But we had an Easter service this morning via teleconference.  We sang. We prayed. And for the first time in my life I preached a sermon over the telephone to a grateful congregation.

Come to think of it, the Christian church has always flourished while operating underground.  In the first century, believers gathered in burial grounds, underground catacombs to worship unseen by others.  Today tourists can go there, and view the graffiti left behind by those early worshipers. And during the communist regimes, underground churches secretly met.  Those cells of Christians later became thriving churches when the restrictions were lifted.  I’m not going to speculate on what the global church will look like when we come out of this pandemic, though many are doing just that.

During the covid-19 pandemic many events and activities had to be cancelled.  Yes, public in person church services have been cancelled for weeks, and will remain so for an undetermined time to come.  But Easter can never be cancelled.  In fact church can never be “cancelled”. The church continues to do what the Christian church does.  We worship. We care for one another and for those in need of help. We pray for one another, for people who are sick and in need, for a world in crisis. And we proclaim the good news  that Jesus is the hope of this world. No pandemic can stop us from doing that. Don’t be fooled.  Easter is not and will never be cancelled!

THE WAY I SEE COVID-19

We have new vocabulary that all of us are navigating.  Social Distancing.  Approximately a month ago few of us had ever heard of the term.  A few weeks into it, many are suggesting it is not a good term, since we are all inherently social beings who need human contact even when we are distant from one another.  So Physical Distancing is the new terminology.  Keep a measured distance apart from one another.  To help define this, we are told where we can go and how often. In the supermarket lines are taped to the floor to ensure that we do not get too close. See-through-barriers for cashiers, bus drivers and others.   And we are not supposed to be in gatherings of people.  At first it was groups no larger than 200, then 50, then 5, and now even meeting with one other person outside of your household is not recommended.  We are threatened with penalties if we do not comply.

Its been a learning curve.  For me, it began earlier than for most.  I went into the hospital at the end of February for an operation, and during my convalescence at home, the Corona Virus (Covid-19) pandemic began to grow and spread.  At first we thought it was something limited to a specific part of the world (China), but now we have the shocking reality of  614,136 worldwide cases,  4,326 of them in Canada.  It has resulted in  28,251 deaths, 55  of them in Canada. And the numbers climb every day, so the ones I cited are probably out of date by the time anyone reads this.    More interesting statistics can be found here.

We have, it seems an information overload on this event that is unlike anything we have seen in modern times.  I will restrict myself therefore, to some personal impressions.

First,  I would mention the sense of shock that I felt the first time I went into a grocery store and saw the empty shelves.  Not only toilet paper and related products were missing,  but the store I went to had no meat, no potatoes, no pasta, no bread.  I felt tears coming to my eyes, because I remember Mom and Dad telling us stories of such conditions in post-war Europe, and I recall seeing documentaries about shortages in countries behind what was once called the Iron Curtain, but I never thought I would see such things with my own eyes here in Canada, the land of plenty that I was raised in. So I tried my luck by going to a second grocery store.  There I was able to pick up the last package of spaghetti (not the kind of pasta I was looking for, but that was the only choice).

Secondly, I am disappointed by the foolishness that I see and hear not only in the media, but even among my own acquaintances.   People who ignore the directives of our governments, and foolishly talk about how the whole thing is exaggerated.

Social media seems to be a great tool to stay in touch with those who mean a lot to us, and whom we cannot be with at this time. Sadly, many abuse that to peddle misinformation about miracle cures.  I too have posted humorous things, thinking we need the relief of humour, but slowly it is no longer funny.

Finally, the pandemic is bringing out the best (or the worst) in people. In short, it is revealing who we really are, and sadly who we will continue to be when its over.  Those who don’t go to church, for example, do not miss the fact that places of worship are closed, and for them nothing will be different when they open again. Those who have been socially distant, remain so to this day, and don’t do anything to reach out to loved ones and others, despite the ironic term of “social media”. I am very happy to be in touch with people that way, and disappointed (but not surprised) by those I have not heard from.  Those who are by nature generous and caring, are the ones who are currently reaching out to the vulnerable and the helpless, and we read touching stories of that. They will continue to be generous and caring when this is all over.

Like many others, I ask myself, when we will return to some level of normality, and how will that normal look? At first we thought it is a matter of weeks, now we are hearing talk about months when the emergency restrictions will be lifted.

I really like what someone has said (and I’d love to give credit but I don’t remember who it was): “in our rush to get back to normal, we should reflect on what we want to get back to, and what we should leave behind”. Couldn’t have said it better myself.

 

HAPPY VALENTINE’S DAY!

Well today is Valentines Day … and those men who forgot it will have a painful reminder from someone who didn’t.  Now depending on how romantic or sentimental you are by nature, we each have a different approach to dealing with the middle of February.  For some it is just a stepping stone between Christmas and Easter — something to add colour and magic to the long and dreary winter. For some this not so holy day is an essential part of their romance, whether the relationship be new and exciting, or one that is long and stable.  Others say that a good marriage or “relationship” as it is called nowadays, really doesn’t need a calendar day to keep it fresh and exciting. For others, the day is an excuse to indulge (or overindulge) in chocolate before the austere season of lent begins. In any case, florists, and the good people at Hallmark love Valentines Day.

So where did the day come from?  Trying to explain that is an exercise in trivia because there are so many stories and legends about how the day actually came to be.  And yes there was a St. Valentine, actually not one but as many as 15. It was a very popular name in antiquity.

My favourite story about the origin of Valentine’s Day concerns a priest by that name who was executed on or about February 14 in the year 270 A.D. This happened during the reign of the Roman Emperor Claudius II, who was a brutal and cruel man. He believed that Roman men were reluctant to join the army because of their attachment to their wives and children.  So his idea of solving the problem was to forbid marriage for young men below a certain age.  Valentine the priest however, continued to perform secret marriages for young lovers.  When he was discovered, he was hauled before Claudius and sentenced to be beaten to death with clubs and to have his head cut off. Legend also has it that while in jail, St. Valentine left a farewell note for the jailer’s daughter, who had become his friend, and signed it “From Your Valentine.”  So Valentine became the martyr who was the champion of love.

The Roman Catholic Church recognizes him and two others by that name on their  official list of  “saints”.  There are different stories and legends behind how St. Valentine’s name became associated with love.  Some believe that the date of his death may have become mingled with the Feast of Lupercalia, a pagan festival of love. On those occasions, the names of young women were placed in a box, from which men could draw random names of people who became their “Valentine” . In 496 A.D., Pope Gelasius decided to put an end to the Feast of Lupercalia, and he declared that February 14 be celebrated as St Valentine’s Day. So there you have it. However you choose to observe or not observe the day, be happy, or better still bring happiness to the ones you love, or those whom you don’t, who need it most!

What to Preach About at Christmas?

I wrote this column a few years ago for my colleagues (and anyone else who wanted to “listen in”).  Here it is back by popular request.

Most churches experience bigger crowds at Christmas or Easter than during the normal course of the year. In the churches that I have served in the past, the church was always full on Christmas Eve, sometimes to overflowing.  In fact many churches have multiple services on Christmas Eve to accommodate the crowds. That would make Christmas Eve even more popular than Easter Sunday  The question is, how do we treat the people that cause our congregations to swell for the holidays?  Some preachers are tempted  (and a few succumb to the temptation) to take advantage of a captive audience.  So over the years of doing Christmas sermons, I have learned what to say and what NOT to say. So let me begin with the “Thou Shalt Not’s” for preachers on Christmas Eve.

  1. THOU SHALT NOT belittle or make fun of “The Christmas and Easter Crowd”.  Yes, it is true that there are people who never darken the door of a church except perhaps on those days, and many of those are there under duress – they came in order to keep peace in their family and to avoid being nagged by the holier than thou relatives.  Do you think you are in any way helpful by making a snide remark about how your church is open all the rest of the year?  Of course you wish they would come back more often, but the way to entice them is to make the service so wonderful that they will think of it themselves, “hey this isn’t so bad!  In fact I rather like it!  Maybe I could try it again some time).  But guilt tripping or shaming them will not motivate them to be back.
  2. THOU SHALT NOT RANT OR RAVE  about the commercialization of Christmas, the hectic activities of the season or for that matter any other subject. Rants are seldom if ever appropriate in the pulpit, but a preacher who gives one at Christmas, has in my opinion, totally failed his or her calling. Yes, everyone knows about how secular and devoid of spiritual meaning Christmas has become in our world. But haven’t you got something more wonderful than that to speak about at Christmas?  How about, “For unto you is born this day a Saviour” ? I want to illustrate this point with a personal experience.  In the church that I grew up in, the Christmas Eve service always began at dusk, so that most of the evening was free for the family celebration that occurs in German families on Christmas Eve.  This meant that it was sometimes difficult to get to the service on time as shops were closing and people were hurrying home from work.  I remember one particular Christmas Eve when our pastor scolded the many late-comers, and angrily talked about how senseless the whole Christmas  razzle-dazzle  was.  I was maybe 12 years old, and could not figure out why the pastor was so angry on Christmas Eve!  Now, more than 60 years later, is it any surprise that this is ALL that I can remember about that particular service?
  3. THOU SHALT NOT TRIFLE WITH NON-ESSENTIAL TRIVIA.  The people sitting in front of you, whether they are faithful attendees or once a year visitors do not care that Jesus was not born on December 25, and that the date for Christmas was fixed by a pope who tried to syncretize a pagan celebration with the birth of Christ.  Nor do they care that the angelic host did not sing but rather “spoke” their gloria in excelsis (see Luke 2:13), nor that we don’t really know how many magi there were, and that they were certainly not “3 Kings of Orient”.  If you think that these details are important to know, then perhaps a Bible study group or a Sunday teaching message on another occasion might be a more appropriate forum to wax eloquent on such gems.  But in the main Christmas services, people come for a variety of reasons: looking for hope, looking to be inspired, longing to have their hearts stirred in worship.  Don’t send them out empty.  Don’t reduce Christmas to a game of trivia.
  4. THOU SHALT NOT FORGET THOSE WHO FIND CHRISTMAS DIFFICULT.  Among your listeners will be people for whom this will be the first Christmas without a loved one whom they lost in the previous year.  Whether it was by death or divorce, or some other loss, they may be emotionally raw.  Or perhaps the loss didn’t happen this year, but it happened long ago at Christmas, and so each year there is a difficult surge of memories.  How do you help such people?  For one thing, don’t ignore them.  On the other hand, don’t rub salt into their wound by singling them out or dwelling on heartache and pain.  A thoughtful gesture might be to refer to all such people in one of the prayers in the service (not by name).  Or a brief word as you give them a special greeting as you shake their hand at the door or a hug if you are the hugging type.

All right then, what SHOULD I preach about at Christmas?  I think the answer to that can best be answered in the words of the hymn writer, Tell me the old, old story. I particularly like the line in the first verse that says, tell me the story simply, as to a little child.  While it may enthral you to wax eloquent on the theological implications of God’s incarnation,  many of those who need to hear the Good News will not understand your ruminations. I recall sitting in the audience of a Christmas service years ago where the man in the pulpit preached on a text from Romans about the doctrine of justification.  He talked about how the cross was more important than the cradle, and his sermon was riddled with terms like Jesus’ blood being shed for our sins.  I felt like giving him a calendar for Christmas.

I have heard preachers complain that they find it hard to find exciting ways to talk about Christmas after doing it for so many years, particularly if you are in the same congregation for a number of years.  I have to say that I don’t understand that.  I have been doing Christmas sermons for well over 40 years, and I have yet to run out of material. While I still have manuscripts of my early efforts, I rarely if ever “dip into the barrel”.   Each year, I immerse myself in the Christmas story in Matthew and Luke’s gospels, and I always find something that is new in that old, old story.  Tell them about the Savior, tell them about the Joy that the new-born King brings and show them how even their own life can be changed by believing that message.  There aren’t enough Christmases to exhaust that message.

POST ELECTION THOUGHTS

On Tuesday, October 22, Canadians woke up to find that the sky hadn’t fallen, and the world hadn’t come to an end.  It will, but not just yet, despite the most acrimonious federal election that I can remember.

As I watched the returns on Monday night, I tried to count how many election nights I had watched – some of them in the very living room where I now live, when I stayed up together with my father and waited to find out who had won.  Since Dad had to get up early the next morning to go to work, he often didn’t sit it out until the end, but I usually liked to stay up at least until the losing political leader had conceded the election.  If I liked the winner, I would stay up for his victory speech, if not I went to bed.  But that was many years ago when I had more energy.  This time I packed it in soon after the outcome was apparent. So I missed the Prime Minister’s rude victory speech that apparently began before Andrew Scheer could finish his concession speech.

Most of us, I’m sure, are all “electioned out”. Even before the campaign officially began, we knew that it would be one of the nastiest in our history.  Enough lies, character assassination to go around.  It was more about sound bites than explanation of platforms or policy.  A farcical English language debate, with a ludicrous format that was carefully crafted by the organizers  appointed by the government to avoid discussion of anything embarrassing to the prime minister, or for that matter things of interest to the voters, such as economic policy or foreign affairs. The prime minister did not have to account for the deficit that his government created, nor his ineffective performance in Canada’s tenuous relations with foreign powers.

During his four years in office, the prime minister has broken almost every promise made in the 2015 election, including the promise of electoral reform.  Now we know why.  To be able to win an election while losing the popular vote.

This time around, about a third of Canada’s eligible voters decided to sit the election out and not vote.  I don’t agree with that, but I do understand the frustration of people who wonder what difference their vote makes, when the outcome of  electing a government for the entire nation is decided in two provinces and a few big cities.

I did vote on Monday, and as I walked into the polling station, I remembered being in Kenya during their last presidential election, and I  thanked God that I live in a country where we can do this in peace, without the violence and deaths that accompanies elections in Kenya.

But needless to say, I think the outcome was not good.  For one thing, we don’t have a truly national government that represents the interests of the whole country called Canada.  The fractured minority parliament represents an array of  regional divisions and alienations.  Western provinces have little representation in the government, and two are not represented at all.  Quebec has a large number of members of parliament whose only interest is “what is good for Quebec” and they have put the minority government on notice that propping the government up comes with a price tag.

For another thing, the governing party managed to become that by sowing and nurturing this disunity throughout the campaign by demonizing provincial premiers who disagreed with the liberal position.  And this was orchestrated by a sitting prime minister who had been found guilty of breaking conflict of interest rules – twice – and whose outright lies on so many issues are well documented.  As it became evident that he once again would be the prime minister, I had to think of 2. Thessalonians 2:11 that talks about people  believing a lie.

Nevertheless, for better or worse, we now have a government, whether it is to our liking or not.  For the Christian this means that while this government may make it more and more difficult for us to live by and express our values, it is still our government.  This means we have the obligation to submit to it, and to pray for it, as 1. Timothy 2:2 commands us.  That verse, to pray for those in authority, was written from prison by the Apostle Paul who was subject to the authority of a government that was much worse than the one Canadians have just elected.  The Roman government under which Paul lived was not a democracy, it was an oppressive regime that persecuted Christians relentlessly.  Ultimately, Paul suffered the death penalty under that government.  So things have turned out badly for Canadians (or at least so I think) but it could be, and perhaps will be, much worse some day.  We’re not there yet.♦

SAVE THE PLANET?

Global Warming.  Climate Change. Greenhouse gases.  It is impossible not to hear these terms, and now that we are in the midst of a federal election we hear them even more.  Now before I say anything else, let me make it clear that I am totally in favour of the idea of taking care of our planet.  God has made us stewards to take care of our earth, and collectively we have done a very poor job of it.

However, the annoyance factor over the hype over this issue has grown to outright disgust and anger for many of us over the way that our politicians of all stripes are using this issue to try and buy our votes. The other day a political flyer arrived at my doorstep which encouraged me to “save the planet” by voting for that party.

So a “reality check” of facts would be in order here.  According to The Union of Concerned Scientists, Canada produces only about 1.6% of the greenhouse gases produced globally.  Even reducing Canada’s portion by 50% will not make much of a difference to our planet’s wellbeing.

According to the scientists mentioned above,

The top six polluters are:

1: China 9,040,000 Metric Tons.

2:  USA 4,997,000 Metric Tons.

3: India: 2,066,000 Metric Tons.

4: Russia 1,468,000 Metric Tons.

5: Japan 1,141,000 Metric Tons.

6: Germany 729,000 Metric Tons.

Canada ranks 9th,with 549,000 Metric Tons or 6% of China, or 1.6% Globally

In the past our governments have set lofty targets, which were never met. The target that the liberals are promoting during this campaign was actually set by the previous Harper conservative government.  At that time, our Prime Minister who was then in opposition,  scoffed at that target as being “insignificant”.  Hypocritically, he has not only borrowed (or stolen) the conservative target, but also introduced a carbon tax which many scientists believe accomplishes very little if anything but grabbing cash for government coffers.

That is why I am not amused by election propaganda that claims that votes for a particular party will “save the planet”.   Nothing will save this planet from what God said will happen to it:  “Heaven and Earth will pass away” (Luke 21:33; Matt.24:35; Mark 13:31)  and John, the apocalyptic writer of the Book of Revelation speaks of  “a new heaven and a new earth for the first earth had passed away”. (Revelation 21:1)

Salvation is needed by the inhabitants of this planet more than the planet itself.  Hardly anyone, whether inside or outside the church, and least of all our politicians care about that.

The views expressed in this post are my own, and not necessarily those of my employer.

BACK TO SCHOOL!

  

 Since August 1 (a month into summer holidays and over a month before school starts) we have been seeing and hearing that phrase. Back to School sale.  How to wean children off holidays and get them back into school mode. How to help them adjust to earlier bed times.  How to pack healthy lunches.  The list goes on and on. Over the course of the month, the intensity of that kind of talk has been building, until it reached a frenzy.  Last week you couldn’t turn on the TV without some advertiser, some newscaster, even the weather forecaster, talking about Back to School.

Of course politicians had to do their share in order to muddy the discussion even more.  Fear mongering about a possible labour dispute among teachers. Mandatory math tests for teachers.  Sex education curriculum (and yes, that one is more about politics than the needs of children).  And finally, in the last days before school, out comes that old chestnut about the ban of cell phones in the classroom, ensuring more heated debate by students and teachers on both sides of the issue.     

Normally I just ignore all that hot air.  But  on August 7 an article on the front page of our local newspaper The Waterloo Region RECORD  really caught my ire. Under the headline Are You Entertained Enough? the article reports about a University of Waterloo study that “finds students expect lecturers to be more interesting so they don’t get distracted by tech [nology] during class“.  The article makes the astounding statement “while students felt that it is their choice to use the technology, they saw it as the instructors’ responsibility to motivate them not to use it”.  Now that is an interesting twist!  Its another way of saying, “I have a right to do this, but it is your fault if I do”. It is blame shifting clear and simple.  It is always someone else’s fault. And of course we all do that on so many different levels in life.  But I will stay with this one issue for today.

As I passed through the various levels of education, beginning in grade school, technology was always in use according to the extent that it was available at the time.  I remember how happy we were as kids when the teacher took us either to the auditorium or some other darkened room to watch a “film” as it was then called (not a movie).  Then came the “film strip”, which was much like coloured slides – images that were projected to a screen.  A recording provided audio commentary with a beep sound to alert the teacher to go to the next frame.  Then came educational television, produced by the Ontario government.  We viewed these programs (black and white at first) on TV monitors that sat on wheeled stands that were tall enough so that the entire class could see the program.

I remember in Jr. High (called senior public in our part of the country) when the overhead projector came out.  Some teachers were skeptical, and others embraced it with a vengeance and literally stopped using the blackboard (or green board. White boards came later).

And when I went to seminary, preaching class included having to preach practice sermons in class.  These sermons were recorded on video tape,  which was then re-played for analysis by the teacher and by your peers. The more often the instructor hit the pause button to make comments,  the worse your sermon was.  And then came the general use of computers and programs like PowerPoint, which today are used extensively by university professors and teachers alike.

In the church, we moved along  using all of the above, though in most cases lagging just a bit behind. I remember the days when missionary slides could be shown in the sanctuary, but movies were relegated to the church basement.  I have used powerpoint for preaching for a number of years, taking into account that some people process information better visually than verbally, and most appreciate having the benefit of both. Technology itself is morally neutral – if we control it, it is our servant.  But unfortunately, more often than not, the reverse is true.

This is the case with the cell phone in the classroom (or the church).  These highly developed devices are usually  “smart phones” meaning that in addition to making and receiving  phone calls, they can also be used to receive and send text messages, emails, or access the internet. There is nothing wrong with any of these activities, except when they distract you from real time activity like conversation  with a real live person in front of you, which can be a dinner date, or a classroom, and yes even in church!

Because of what these devices can do, the potential for distraction is always high. But it is a real stretch to say that that being distracted is not your own fault, but the fault of the other.  Can you imagine saying to your dinner date,  “sorry but you are not interesting enough, so I have to yield to the temptation to check this message”?

It annoys me to no end to be in the company of someone who is constantly reaching for their smart phone to read or answer some type of message. It makes me feel so unimportant to that person sitting across from me.  To use the logic of the UW study, maybe I’m not interesting enough to motivate the person not to reach for their smart phone.  There is only one word to describe the reasoning of people in that study (or outside of it) – ludicrous!  Those students should re-assess why they are in that classroom, and how motivated they are to succeed.

I have spent a just a little time teaching at a post-secondary level when I taught at a college in Kenya for six months in two years.  In Kenya, everyone has a cell phone or smart phone, whether they can afford it or not. Therefore in the first lecture of each course that I taught, I laid down the law:  I don’t want to see (or hear) your phone at any time in my lecture hall.  And no, you may not go out into the hall to use your phone. All of my students survived this measure, and some even got pretty good marks!

Of course I can’t do that  in church, because people don’t have to be there.  When I’m preaching, and I see someone  using a smart device, I give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that they are either accessing their online Bible, or taking notes, even though I know that most of them are not.  (You would be surprised what the preacher can see – and when someone is looking in their lap and smiling, they are probably zoned out of what is happening in the service).  But I will not compete with your smart phone.  What you get out of the service really depends on what you put into it.  Its up to you.